Decomposing Venture: Echo Chamber
Global Investor Hannah Savage Explores Reclaiming Independent Judgment in Venture Capital
Observation
A recent conversation has been echoing in my mind, a powerful observation about the very foundation of venture capital (VC): investment decisions are too often driven by the ingrained beliefs of investors and their immediate networks, rather than a rigorous analysis of true market demand.
Judgment
This sentiment struck a particular chord, especially when considering the pervasive phrase, "I follow tier one investors." While acknowledging the experience and insights of established firms and peers in the industry is an acceptable part of the due diligence process, it cannot be the only part of the due diligence process. The uncritical adoption of other firms' portfolio choices raises fundamental questions. Does this reliance signal a lack of independent conviction? If general partners (GPs) don’t trust their own judgment, we must wonder why their limited partners (LPs) wouldn't simply allocate capital directly to "tier one" funds. What unique perspective and differentiated value proposition do such general partners (GPs) truly offer their limited partners (LPs)?
Juncture
This brings us to a critical juncture: How do we, as investors (i.e., GPs), cultivate a culture of accountability? This accountability must extend in two vital directions:
Making investment decisions rooted in demonstrable market forces
Fostering the courage to trust and act upon our own well-informed judgment
So, how can we move beyond the VC echo chamber and cultivate this essential culture of general partner (GP) accountability? Several avenues may apply:
Embracing Continuous Learning: In any dynamic profession, stagnation is the antithesis of growth. Shouldn't VC, with its constant exposure to innovation and decomposition, demand a commitment to ongoing education? This could involve actively seeking diverse perspectives, engaging in industry-specific training and fostering open dialogues with peers – even those with differing viewpoints.
The Power of Peer Learning: We are all navigating a complex landscape. Creating structured opportunities for investors to learn from each other's successes and failures, to share insights and challenge assumptions, may be invaluable in refining our individual and collective acumen.
Cultivating Intellectual Humility: VCs may reward conviction, but it's crucial to balance that with humility. Admitting that we don't possess all the answers, being open to being wrong and actively seeking disconfirming evidence are hallmarks of intellectual maturity and can lead to more robust decision-making.
Defining and Defending a Strong Thesis: A well-articulated investment thesis, grounded in thorough market research and a unique perspective, serves as a compass. It provides a framework for evaluating opportunities and acts as an anchor against the sway of prevailing trends or the endorsements of others. Confidence in this thesis, developed through rigorous analysis, empowers GPs to act decisively based on their own convictions and judgements.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the strength and dynamism of the VC ecosystem depends on investors who are not simply followers but thoughtful, independent thinkers. By embracing continuous learning, fostering peer exchange, cultivating humility and operating from a well-defined thesis, we can move beyond the limitations of echo chambers and build a future where investment decisions are driven by genuine market demand and understanding and the power of informed, individual judgment. PS: Stay tuned for the final part of Porter's 5 Forces: Competitive Rivalry.
Apply
Please feel free to apply for funding via the following link.
Feedback
Please feel free to give feedback via the following link.
Subscribe
Please feel free to follow the “Decomposing Venture” series by Global Investor Hannah Savage using the “Subscribe” button below.